Safe Schools for Prince George's County

Parents, Neighbors, and Students Against  Cell Towers on School Property

Examples of cell tower moratoriums,  setbacks,  and  local government actions to halt cell tower construction

 “As firefighters and paramedics, we live in these firehouses. What effect will these towers have on us? What are the risks to our neighbors? It’s a no-brainer that LA County should at least have done a proper study before before putting 200-foot high-power microwave antennas on top of our heads."

​-Los Angeles Fire Captain Dave Gillotte stated these words when cell towers were slated to go on his station  in spring of 2015. The firefighters were successful in stopping these towers  and the LA supervisors stopped construction because of their advocacy. http://abc7.com/news/la-supervisors-stop-cell-tower-construction-at-fire-stations/571612/


Michigan, HOUGHTON

Concerned Houghton parents are now relieved; the Verizon cell phone tower is no longer happening by the school.
The 75-foot tower was planned to sit 300 feet south from the Houghton-Portage Township Schools. Parents found out Tuesday that Verizon has backed out the plan. Several parents were against the tower, saying it can lead to brain cancer. http://www.uppermichiganssource.com/news/story.aspx?id=1211309#.VWpOfItZ-JU

Spokane Washington,  City Council puts moratorium on cell towers

Last night city council members voted unanimously for a six month moratorium that includes current applications, on any new cell towers in the City of Spokane. http://www.khq.com/story/28360355/city-council-puts-moratorium-on-cell-towers

Dekalb County Georgia Drops School Tower Plan, Jan 2015
Dekalb County Commissioner Jeff Rader from District 2 has issued a press release about the end to the six-way battle between the residents, the school board, the school administration, the county commissioners and the county CEO's office and, of course, T-mobile.  “The proposed policy turns on the inherent incompatibility of a free-standing antenna with a surrounding single family neighborhood, and not on the concerns that some citizens have about the radio waves generated by the antenna. “

Superintendent Michael Thurmond reports that the contracts for all 9 of the schools originally slated for T Mobile cell towers "have been dropped."  Read the Press Release HERE http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=a804613b8cccee6286d4bfc9f&id=eb430f3199&e=4be7a89575

“To sublease the land right out from under the children is bad enough, but to do it without even respecting the local zoning regulations and safety ordinances put in place to protect people who live there defies the moral code of most real "persons”.
The new zoning ordinance can be found online at http://planningdekalb.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/finalDraftZoningCodeJan20151.pdf

School Cell Tower Lawsuits  in Georgia

“This is a victory for the children in DeKalb schools and the residents who live near DeKalb schools,” May said in a statement. “The court’s decisions is consistent with the county’s position that private actors on school property have to comply with the county’s zoning codes.” http://news.blog.ajc.com/2015/01/20/school-cell-tower-lawsuits-conclude/#__federated=1

Alameda: School leaders call for removal of cell phone towers

“Trustees with the Alameda Unified School District have called on AT&T to remove its cell phone towers at two campuses after parents and others said they feared emissions from the towers could threaten children's health.” In addition to the AT&T towers at Maya Lin and Wood, T-Mobile has a tower at Alameda High School on Encinal Avenue. Sprint/Nextel recently removed its tower from Wood.

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_26600698/alameda-school-leaders-call-removal-cell-phone-towers

Alameda Unified to cancel cell tower contracts “In a closed-door session, the board opted to direct school district staff to notify the owners of cell antennae installed atop Maya Lin School and Will C. Wood Middle School that their contracts will be terminated, board president Margie Sherratt announced at the start of Tuesday’s school board meeting.http://blog.sfgate.com/inalameda/2014/09/10/alameda-unified-to-cancel-cell-tower-contracts/


Teton County, Wyoming
Teton County puts moratorium on new cell towers


The moratorium approved last week will give the county time to write new cell-tower regulations. “But Melissa Wittstruck of the Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance says current county cell tower regulations are outdated and insufficient to deal with modern laws and equipment.” http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/wyoming/teton-county-puts-moratorium-on-new-cell-towers/article_36eefdfc-1dbf-5131-be4c-7998fbe285f2.html#ixzz3UOw2nVOW


Maine, West Gardiner enacts cell tower and wind turbine moratorium

The town adopted the moratorium at a special town meeting Saturday in response to a plan to build a cellphone tower on Crams Point on Cobbossee Lake. http://www.centralmaine.com/2014/09/04/west-gardiner-enacts-cell-tower-and-wind-turbine-moratorium/


CHARLESTON Illinois: Council confirms cell tower moratorium, November 10, 2014 5:33 pm

A newly passed moratorium means no new cellphone towers in Charleston for at least six months. City council members passed the moratorium on issuing permits for telecommunications towers or antennae during a special session . It was approved to give council members time to research and bring their findings before the Board of Zoning Appeals and Planning, Mayor Larry Rennels said.

http://jg-tc.com/news/council-confirms-cell-tower-moratorium/article_43d54324-6676-5f6d-8081-13ef792b655b.html


Lebanon,  Tennessee, Commissioners vote Yes on cell tower moratorium

A moratorium on new cell tower applications. “Thomas said he wanted to amend the resolution so that the moratorium would be a period "up to 365 days" and that the moratorium "does not apply if the tower is 1,500 feet or more from a residential area or school." http://www.lebanondemocrat.com/article/wilson-county/420096


Juneau Alaska: Juneau Assembly OKs cell tower moratorium    

The moratorium blocks permitting of new wireless communications towers until May 19. Between now and then the assembly hopes to adopt a master plan regulating where and how cell towers are built. “What we should have is an opportunity, real opportunities, for the public to participate both in the structuring of the final ordinance, and during the siting of different towers,” he said. http://www.ktoo.org/2014/02/25/juneau-assembly-oks-cell-tower-moratorium/

Transylvania County North Carolina, Voting on a Moratorium

“There will be a hearing by the Transylvania County Board of Commissioners to consider placing a six month moratorium on accepting applications for new telecommunications towers. This moratorium is only temporary, the purpose of which is to allow the commissioners sufficient time to revise the current 18-year old tower ordinance that is now outdated.”


San Miguel County Extends Moratorium on Cell Towers

01/27/13   – The San Miguel County Commissioners approved a six-month extension of an emergency moratorium on development of new telecommunication towers. The moratorium halts the development of new telecommunication towers that are 35-feet in height or taller and related facilities proposed to be located in any and all zone districts, except the county’s West End Zone District. ..The purpose of the moratorium is to provide time to amend the San Miguel County Land Use Code in order to develop and update code provisions that deal with the installation of new cellular towers their related facilities.  http://www.thewatchmedia.com/san-miguel-county-extends-moratorium-on-cell-towers-2/



Maine, Eustis cell tower public hearing heated, moratorium extended

“Eustis’ moratorium on cell towers will continue till the end of the year, and beyond if needed, until the planning board can draft a cell tower ordinance that is acceptable to the town.” http://www.theirregular.com/news/2012-10-31/Front_Page/Eustis_cell_tower_public_hearing_heated_moratorium.html



Kirkwood. Missouri, Council Approves Moratorium On New Cell Towers

September 13, 2013
The Webster Groves City Council on Sept. 3 approved imposing a moratorium of up to six months on the issuing of permits for the development, construction or placement of wireless communications infrastructure, including wireless cell towers, within the city. The moratorium was needed to allow the city time to study whether to update its own laws regarding wireless communications infrastructure, in light of new state laws that were to have become effective Aug. 28, according to City Attorney Helmut Starr.

http://www.websterkirkwoodtimes.com/Articles-Webster-Groves-i-2013-09-13-189459.114137-Council-Approves-Moratorium-On-New-Cell-Towers.html#ixzz3UOtd4zSp


Maine, Brooksville

With heavy turnout, Brooksville enacts cell tower moratorium at special town meeting
https://penobscotbaypress.com/news/2010/oct/7/heavy-turnout-brooksville-enacts-cell-tower-morato/#.VQSyB4s-BR4



Silver Spring Montgomery County Maryland
Breaking NEWS; AT&T Withdraws Cell Tower Plans in Face of Community Opposition. 2014


Silver Spring, MD – In what amounted to a David vs. Goliath faceoff, New Cingular Wireless (AT&T Mobility) has cancelled its plans to build a 101 foot high commercial cell tower on the Sligo Baptist Church property at 1610 Dennis Avenue in Silver Spring (MD, 20902) in an environmentally sensitive section of a residential neighborhood and in the face of stiff neighborhood opposition. ‘We had the facts and the community on our side. They should never have considered this location given that such a tower would harm the forest, wildlife, storm water ponds, and people.”

In other communities, cell towers have led to diesel oil leaks, fires, noise, and property values being reduced up to 20 percent.For more information, visit www.CellTowerNOT.weebly.com.


Durham North Carolina 03/11/2015

New cell-tower rules for Durham move forward, Proposed new rules on cellphone towers give homeowners more say about “monopines” being built in their neighborhoods.

The commission voted to recommend that the council and commissioners adopt the new rules as drafted, but with one change: that property zoned “Rural Residential” have the same height restrictions as other non-rural zones if the property is within a “suburban” zoning tier.

The revised rules also:
▪  Require a tower owner to have $1 million worth of liability insurance; currently, there is no insurance requirement.
▪  Treat most monopines – towers disguised to resemble pine trees – as “non-concealed” WCFs so they then need special-use permits.
▪   Restrict tower height in most residential zones to 20 feet above whatever the base zoning allows – generally, 35 feet.
▪  Increases the required setback from property lines and natural-gas pipes to 120 percent of the tower’s height or 85 feet, whichever is greater, so that adjoining property will not be damaged in case of a collapse.
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/community/durham-news/article13546709.html#storylink=cpy


Santa Fe New Mexico
Santa Fe School Board Unanimous: No Cell Tower by Gonzales School


“The 1996 Telecommunications Act disqualifies local opposition to cell tower siting based on health concerns, but this didn’t stop community members from stating the obvious: they are worried for their children’s health. Gonzales parent Dee Beingessner’s statement captured the sense of the meeting: “I have applied for a transfer already for all four of my children to leave Gonzales Elementary if a cell tower is erected. If the transfers don’t go through, my children–all four of them–will go to private schools, unfortunately. I’m a big believer in public schools, but I will not risk the health and safety of my children.”

https://lajicarita.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/santa-fe-school-board-unanimous-no-cell-tower-by-gonzales-school/



Milpitas Calif. School Board votes to move cell tower, Milpitas Post, Mar 11, 2015

“The board gave staff direction to ask Crown Castle and its customer T-Mobile to relocate the cell tower on campus to a more remote location at Rancho, with a technical feasibility study to come over the next four months.”

http://bayareane.ws/1MvA0Sp


Laguna Beach, California : St. Catherine church won't get wireless antennas, AT&T says

“AT&T, responding to community outcry, has decided to drop a plan to install wireless equipment in an existing tower at St. Catherine of Siena Parish to boost service in Laguna Beach.”

http://www.coastlinepilot.com/news/tn-cpt-me-0220-wireless-antenna-20150219,0,3937911.story


California: Parents blast school district regarding on-campus cell towers
San Jose Mercury News, Jan 29, 2015

http://bayareane.ws/1zn4fXT


Virginia Rappahannock County
School board declines cell tower lease


1:30 p.m. Jan. 15 By a vote of 3-2, the Rappahannock County School Board Tuesday night (Jan. 13) voted against entering a controversial lease agreement with Community Wireless Structures (CWS), the Arlington company which had offered to construct a monopole for prospective mobile carriers on high school property.

http://www.rappnews.com/2015/01/15/school-board-declines-cell-tower-lease-2/139129/


California: Capitola City Council says no to Verizon cell tower
Santa Cruz Sentinel, Jan 14, 2015

http://bit.ly/1CLSlau



India: Zilla Parishad orders removal of cellphone towers near schools in district


Cellphone towers located within a 50-metre radius from a school's premises will be removed
There are over 1,000 cellphone towers in the district, Umap said. "Various studies by scientists have shown that the radiation from cellphone towers is proving to be a health hazard. Students will be exposed to such radiation if these towers are located close to schools. We will see to it that the health of students is given the priority and cellphone towers will be moved away from schools." ...
http://bit.ly/1DbJD8H


Massachusetts : Worcester city council backs neighbors in fight against cell tower

The Worcester City Council took action Tuesday night to support neighbors opposing the installation of a 150-foot cell tower on the EcoTarium’s land on Harrington Way.

http://www.masslive.com/news/worcester/index.ssf/2014/12/worcester_city_council_backs_n.html